Author: yvonneharbison

  • Some neat Writerly Things

    The Writer’s Digest is just a treasure trove.  I love them.  Thanks to student loans, my subscription has lapsed, but they still have the online offerings!!!

    I found a few, so I’ll share what I liked in the hopes of remembering them later. 😉

    How to Create Your Own Bad Guys and Sleazy Protagonists
    This had some interesting ideas and I want to employ them at some point.

    The 5 Differences Between Professional and Amateur Novelists
    And then there was this, which was just a few things to keep in mind on the whole “I wanna be a writer when I grow up!” front.

    So, What Exactly is Steampunk?
    Ha!  This is only the tip of the iceberg!  (I Steampunk’d my Masters thesis!)

    I am a big fan of sitting on the shoulders of giants.  There’s so much that can be learned if we just listen to the people who already did the legwork!  Science uses a similar model, after all: Read the process, repeat the process, prove or disprove the theory.  Same goes for Writing.  We have some really great classics to draw from. (I’m sure at some point I’ll ramble pitifully about Shakespeare.  Just give me time.)  One of the giants, for me, is a filmmaker you may have heard of named Alfred Hitchcock.

    A cool article from WD on his writing tricks: 6 Writing Lessons from Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window

    But there’s this even cooler actual interview with the man that is really worth the watching.  I found it at the Alfred Hitchcock wiki. There is really nothing I don’t love about that interview.  So… go check it out!

  • It’s a Learning Experience

    So this writing thing.  It turns out it’s hard to do.  It takes a toll.  I’m not complaining, mind you, just making the observation.  I have been working on multiple projects, one after the other more than all at once, since September.  I’ve discovered I’m not good at multitasking on projects. None of the writing projects were for a paycheck, they were just for practice.  Bah, you say, writing doesn’t take practice.  Oh, no, I assure you. Writing takes practice.  This is what I have learned and am a little surprised by, so I’ll share.

    The obvious reason for practice is the whole “putting words in their proper order” thing, finding that writer’s voice. Sometimes the words just spew out in the perfect formation, the perfect timing and pacing and perfectly concise.  Other times, they don’t.  But improvement always happens whether you intend it to or not.  It’s called practice; even writers have to pay attention to the old “How do you get to Carnegie Hall” joke.  You get better steps at a time until you’re good.  (I’m still at the getting better stage.)

    The next important practice lesson is related to the first: editing.  When those words don’t just flow out in the perfect prose, editing is required to get them there.  And a large part of editing is the practice at recognizing when your work is weak.  What places aren’t clear or don’t make sense?  Where could you be more concise? Does that sentence have any relevance at all to the rest of the paragraph?  As the writer, I know what I meant to convey because, well, duh, I wrote it, so it obviously made sense in my head.  But that doesn’t mean it is what comes across to the reader.  Recognizing the difference takes work.  Being willing to repair the fault takes more work.  Not murdering the poor unlucky bastard who dares point out your mistakes takes goddamn Herculean restraint sometimes.  But, son of a god or not, even Herc had to train.  In the case of writing, it becomes stronger for the author’s ability to recognize when to edit, how far to edit, and when to say enough is enough before you make mincemeat of good words.

    And the last practice point I’ve learned is the one you always hear about but never fully understand until you realize you’re doing it.  You have to practice devoting the time to writing.  It becomes a second job.  One you don’t necessarily reap any financial benefits from.  The benefits come in other ways.  The more you make a routine out of putting your butt in that writer’s chair, the more your brain learns to think about writer stuff.  Less writer’s block! Less format/punctuation/grammar quandaries! Less wondering what comes next!  Did I mention less writer’s block?  Not to say it doesn’t happen, because it does, but you teach yourself how to work through it. Working through it is key and the only one who can teach you how to work through it is… yourself.

    The more time you spend doing-the-writing-thing, the more you learn to catch the errors as you make them.  You learn to think like your characters, how they would respond, what choices they would make and how the story would be steered by those choices.  You learn to think as you go and loosen up about the whole “plan” you started with (sometimes where you expect to end up and where the story actually goes are two different places.  Sometimes they’re more than two.  And that’s actually all okay.) so that you end up with a story and characters that are true to the story and the characters rather than a rigid idea of where they were supposed to go.  A parent doesn’t know who their toddler will be at the age of twenty, so why does a writer have to know exactly how a character will grow from whatever toll they are put through by the story?  Guidelines are useful, but don’t let them strangle you.

    The trade-off is a personal toll on the writer if they’re not careful.  You find out who your friends are.  Who is willing to put up with your flights into a fantasy world that only exists in your head.  Who is willing to give you the space and the time to write. Who is willing to be your sounding board and cheerleader and reality check when you need any or all of the above.  Those people are rare and precious.  Other people demand your time, never recognizing the fact that writing, whether it makes money or not, is a second job, or maybe a third one.  Some people see it as a pipe-dream that will never happen, because someday never gets here.  Which is all well and good, pragmatic if not embittered, but if you want to be a writer, you can’t buy into that schtick.  It’s a line that will derail every thought process it encounters. We can be our own worst critics, highly susceptible to that kind of logic, and it can be poisonous.  Stick with the people who believe in you for purely selfish reasons: if they believe in you, it must mean there’s something to it, so you can believe too.  (I know that sounds sappy and ridiculous, But I’m Not Kidding!)  Even if it’s stupid, keep doing it, and listen to the people who tell you it’s not stupid.  If they tell you it’s stupid, find out why, and make it un-stupid.

    That’s all the crazy, stand-out, “Woah, they weren’t kidding in the disclaimer!” stuff I’ve learned in the past six months of trying to be a writer.  It’s the stuff I’m going to keep reminding myself as I go along because some of it is too easy to forget, and it can get to feeling like ramming your head into a wall.  Well, it’s part of the process, as it turns out!

    So how do I cope? I keep some coffee handy.  If you’re going to bash your head into walls, at least have some liquid energy to really give it your all. 😉

  • Caffeinated Reviews – Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters

    This weekend, I went on a Percy Jackson binge.  After watching Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief, I dragged my friend to see Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters.  I didn’t like the writing in the books well enough to read past the first installment, but I do like the movies. The books are “young adult” and written for the average 10 to 14 year old reader, while the movies are enjoyable for the actual “adult” demographic. There were maybe two kids in the theatre I saw it in, (I went to an early Sunday morning showing) and a good fifteen to twenty adults aged 20 through 50.

    So what’s it about? When Half-Blood Camp is attacked and endangered, Percy must overcome his own misgivings – and an old enemy – in order to find the mythic Golden Fleece capable of restoring the camp’s protections. There’s adventure, fight scenes, a smattering of drama, and a good wash of humor to keep the movie entertaining. I left the theatre with that confidence that comes from $8 well-spent on a 1.5 hour reality check-out. (I call it the movie-buzz.)

    Going a little more in depth at it – without spoiling anything – I give good marks across the board. I liked the continuity it maintained from the first movie. It felt like the same world, even though the actors were all older and the characters were dealing with different problems in their teenaged lives. I thought they showed age-appropriate dialogue and characterization, too; Teenagers sounded like savvy teenagers and showed growth from the first movie.

    The weak spots were easily overlooked with an eye roll but they were there. (And here thar be spoilers. ) Tyson was an awkward thread. From his parentage to Anna-Beth’s reaction to him, it felt shoehorned for awkard morale-drama and played out a bit over-done.  Percy was feeling down and out and needed another quest to cheer him up. The quest was enough to work with. But with the addition of Tyson to the quest, they lay on the “it could be worse, you could have been born a freak!” just a little thick. One of the reasons I like this series is the empowerment it brings to kids who didn’t grow up playing football and hanging out with the cool kids, and bringing in a character that looks funny and thinks slow to be mocked and feared by Percy’s crowd – even temporarily – messes with that.  Tyson had to hide who he was to fit in which works against message for the series. Worse, the acting in those scenes just didn’t work as well as the rest of the movie.

    The story also still has an odd timeline in regards to locations, relying on a bit of magic-wand waving over issues of transportation, same as in the first movie.  The kids crossed the eastern coastline in good time, but I’m not sure how they managed it.Everything else is detailed and researched, but they couldn’t address how the heroes got around on their quest while working under a deadline? Small details like this distract me from the story!

    My only other nit-picky observation is that it was possibly a little heavy on the external monologue – hello Percy Hamlet, nice to meet you – and family drama, but considering it is centered around demigods with daddy-issues that comes with the territory.

    The movie made good use of location and CGI combos. Pretty things to look at and weird things to ewww at, both used to drag the viewer into Percy’s world. I particularly liked the sci-fi fandom nods in casting and scripting, but you can go on that scavenger hunt yourself. (And if they weren’t intentional, they left in some very clever ad lib choices.) I also loved the score, and the original music at the end was something I hadn’t seen done in awhile and appreciated for that. I’m not that old, really, but I get pretty nostalgic about movies over the strangest things. Songs written for movies is one of these things apparently.

    All in all, I would (and do) recommend this movie if it falls in your genre. Go to have fun and you will more than likely leave with the mission accomplished.

  • Reviews

    It has been decided – by me, of course, because I own this particular digital neighborhood – that I shall wander into the over-heated world of reviews. Book and movie reviews. Why would I do this? What gives me the right to opinionate on someone else’s hard work? I’m not published, after all, I have never accomplished what they have, so why should I begrudge their work?

    The answer is simple. I’m a reader. A viewer. The audience.  If it works for me, if I like their work, then I can write a review to share that. If there are parts that don’t work for me, I can politely and thoughtfully explain what those were. Should the writers ever stumble on these web-documented thoughts, hopefully my point of view will be helpful rather than offensive.  Feedback is a writer’s friend and if they have gotten this far in their career that I would be reading their work off the shelves of the local bookstores, they have developed pretty thick skin. In the meantime, it goes toward my own stockpile of “things not to do” when I find those things that don’t benefit my experience of the story.

    However. If I’ve bothered to read the book/watch the movie (or both) and think about it enough to write a review, there are very good odds that I don’t have anything scandalous to say about it. It is far more likely that I would be impressed and secretly wishing I could buy the author a cup of coffee and pick their brain for their success secrets. Maybe use the cuppa as a distraction to steal their writing pens.

  • Creativity

    Creativity is an odd beast to corner. It doesn’t behave predictably. It isn’t rational. The cliché is that you court the muse, you don’t chase it. But really, courting implies you – as the courter to the courtee – have some modicum of intentional control, the ability to manipulate and to train the muse.

    I’m really not sure that’s accurate.

    We can chase and cajole and promise the moon with sweet words, but the muse, the creative spark that shapes whatever art we hope to create, still has to have its way at some point. The first draft, the words on the page, the maddening urge to spew letters onto a blank canvas, has to be allowed to go its course before we, as writers or artists or directors or – insert creative outlet here – can pretend to control or tame it by the editing process.

    For instance, right now I have a half dozen projects demanding my attention because I sincerely love them and would rather spend my time writing them than at the old 9 to 5. And yet I am in the percolating stage. I am reading, watching movies and tv, enjoying my friends and family’s company, and listening to music in my car as loud as I can stand it. I am absorbing instead of creating anything.

    And the muses insist that this is how it should be done. They reward me with fragments and glimpses to put on the page and then send me back out into the world. That’s Stage One. It is a vital part of the creative process. But damned if it isn’t annoying!

  • RE: Mission Statement

    RE: Mission Statement

    I have a confession to make. I’m a coffee addict. I can’t make it through my 9 to 5 without the stuff. I prefer a Starbucks peppermint mocha frap, or the other favorite is from a local place – Peanut butter, chocolate mocha, and coffee, all blended with a beautiful mixture of milk and ice and sometimes caramel… ahhh! Coffee! The only thing better is Coffee and a morning off to write.